Neuer Krankheitserreger bei GM Pflanzen / Roundup / Monsanto

Meldung des Tages
DieterB
Beiträge: 745
Registriert: Do 16. Dez 2010, 00:32
Wohnort: Alentejo

Neuer Krankheitserreger bei GM Pflanzen / Roundup / Monsanto

#1

Beitrag von DieterB » Mi 23. Feb 2011, 17:06

Don Huber, Professor an der Purdue Universitaet in den Staaten, warnt vor einem neuen Krankheitserreger bei Pflanzen, der auch fuer Tiere und Menschen gefaehrlich sein kann. Dieser Krankheitserreger wurde besonders bei Mais und Soya beobachtet, die fuer den Anbau mit Roundup (RR: Roundup Ready) genetisch modifiziert wurden. Der Virus verursacht das Welken und Absterben der Pflanzen und, nach ersten Erkenntnissen, kann auch fuer Unfruchtbarkeit oder Abgaengen bei landwirtschaftlichen Nutztieren verantwortlich sein, die mit genetisch veraenderten Pflanzen gefuettert wurden. Don Huber warnt vor katastrophalen Folgen fuer die amerikanische Landwirtschaft.

Hier ist ein offener Brief von Don Huber an die amerikanische Aufsichtsbehoerde:
Dear Secretary Vilsack:

A team of senior plant and animal scientists have recently brought to my attention the discovery of an electron microscopic pathogen that appears to significantly impact the health of plants, animals, and probably human beings. Based on a review of the data, it is widespread, very serious, and is in much higher concentrations in Roundup Ready (RR) soybeans and corn-suggesting a link with the RR gene or more likely the presence of Roundup. This organism appears NEW to science!

This is highly sensitive information that could result in a collapse of US soy and corn export markets and significant disruption of domestic food and feed supplies. On the other hand, this new organism may already be responsible for significant harm (see below). My colleagues and I are therefore moving our investigation forward with speed and discretion, and seek assistance from the USDA and other entities to identify the pathogen's source, prevalence, implications, and remedies.

We are informing the USDA of our findings at this early stage, specifically due to your pending decision regarding approval of RR alfalfa. Naturally, if either the RR gene or Roundup itself is a promoter or co-factor of this pathogen, then such approval could be a calamity. Based on the current evidence, the only reasonable action at this time would be to delay deregulation at least until sufficient data has exonerated the RR system, if it does.

For the past 40 years, I have been a scientist in the professional and military agencies that evaluate and prepare for natural and manmade biological threats, including germ warfare and disease outbreaks. Based on this experience, I believe the threat we are facing from this pathogen is unique and of a high risk status. In layman's terms, it should be treated as an emergency.

A diverse set of researchers working on this problem have contributed various pieces of the puzzle, which together presents the following disturbing scenario:

Unique Physical Properties
This previously unknown organism is only visible under an electron microscope (36,000X), with an approximate size range equal to a medium size virus. It is able to reproduce and appears to be a micro-fungal-like organism. If so, it would be the first such micro-fungus ever identified. There is strong evidence that this infectious agent promotes diseases of both plants and mammals, which is very rare.
Pathogen Location and Concentration It is found in high concentrations in
Roundup Ready soybean meal and corn, distillers meal, fermentation feed
products, pig stomach contents, and pig and cattle placentas.

Linked with Outbreaks of Plant Disease
The organism is prolific in plants infected with two pervasive diseases that are driving down yields and farmer income-sudden death syndrome (SDS) in soy, and Goss' wilt in corn. The pathogen is also found in the fungal causative agent of SDS (Fusarium solani fsp glycines).

Implicated in Animal Reproductive Failure
Laboratory tests have confirmed the presence of this organism in a wide variety of livestock that have experienced spontaneous abortions and infertility. Preliminary results from ongoing research have also been able to reproduce abortions in a clinical setting.

The pathogen may explain the escalating frequency of infertility and spontaneous abortions over the past few years in US cattle, dairy, swine, and horse operations. These include recent reports of infertility rates in dairy heifers of over 20%, and spontaneous abortions in cattle as high as 45%.

For example, 450 of 1,000 pregnant heifers fed wheatlege experienced spontaneous abortions. Over the same period, another 1,000 heifers from the same herd that were raised on hay had no abortions. High concentrations of the pathogen were confirmed on the wheatlege, which likely had been under weed management using glyphosate.

Recommendations
In summary, because of the high titer of this new animal pathogen in Roundup Ready crops, and its association with plant and animal diseases that are reaching epidemic proportions, we request USDA's participation in a multi-agency investigation, and an immediate moratorium on the deregulation of RR crops until the causal/predisposing relationship with glyphosate and/or RR plants can be ruled out as a threat to crop and animal production and human health.

It is urgent to examine whether the side-effects of glyphosate use may have facilitated the growth of this pathogen, or allowed it to cause greater harm to weakened plant and animal hosts. It is well-documented that glyphosate promotes soil pathogens and is already implicated with the increase of more than 40 plant diseases; it dismantles plant defenses by chelating vital nutrients; and it reduces the bioavailability of nutrients in feed, which in turn can cause animal disorders. To properly evaluate these factors, we request access to the relevant USDA data.

I have studied plant pathogens for more than 50 years. We are now seeing an unprecedented trend of increasing plant and animal diseases and disorders. This pathogen may be instrumental to understanding and solving this problem. It deserves immediate attention with significant resources to avoid a general collapse of our critical agricultural infrastructure.

Sincerely,

COL (Ret.) Don M. Huber Emeritus Professor, Purdue University APS Coordinator, USDA National Plant Disease Recovery System (NPDRS)

Benutzeravatar
guenther
Beiträge: 692
Registriert: Mi 1. Sep 2010, 21:34
Wohnort: SW-england

Re: Neuer Krankheitserreger bei GM Pflanzen

#2

Beitrag von guenther » Mi 23. Feb 2011, 22:07

schon gespannt, was dabei rauskommt. :bang:

was ist eigentlich aus den GV- baumwolle missernten in indien rausgekommen??????????

ich meine, ausser den vielen selbstmorden :mrgreen:

lg. guenther

Benutzeravatar
guenther
Beiträge: 692
Registriert: Mi 1. Sep 2010, 21:34
Wohnort: SW-england

Re: Neuer Krankheitserreger bei GM Pflanzen

#3

Beitrag von guenther » Fr 25. Feb 2011, 00:36

abgesehen von diesen krankheitserregern, wurden zb. in mexiko, wo GV-mais verboten ist, schon GV-mais entdeckt, der praktisch illegal von den USA eingewandert ist :lol:

dadurch sind natuerlich viele heimische land-arten von mais, der ueber jahrtausende gezuechtet wurden, und viele verschiedene wertvolle gene enthalten, in ihrer existenz gefaehrdet.

das scheint auch die situation bei allen anderen kulturpflanzen zu sein :bang:

falls ich das falsch verstanden habe, bitte berichtige mich Dieter

lg. guenther

DieterB
Beiträge: 745
Registriert: Do 16. Dez 2010, 00:32
Wohnort: Alentejo

Re: Neuer Krankheitserreger bei GM Pflanzen

#4

Beitrag von DieterB » Fr 25. Feb 2011, 12:29

Hallo Guenther, ich kenn mich mit der Situation in Mexiko nicht aus, aber es ist sicher, dass genmanipuliertes Saatgut die Artenvielfalt gefaehrdet. Und wir koennen davon ausgehen, dass die meisten Behauptungen der Biotech Industrie falsch sind. Hier ist ein Text von Vandana Shiva, in dem sie zeigt, dass entgegen den Behauptungen der Industrie, Gentechnologie die Artenvielfalt gefaehrdet, zu verstaerktem Einsatz von giftigen Chemikalien fuehrt, Treibhausgas-Emissionen erhoeht, Ernteertraege nicht erhoeht und die Pflanzen nicht geeigneter macht fuer Klimawandel-bedingte Wetterextreme.

Dieter

Climate Change And Agriculture
By Dr. Vandana Shiva 23 February, 2011
http://www.countercurrents.org/shiva230211.htm
Biodiverse Ecological Farming is the Answer, not Genetic Engineering
Industrial globalised agriculture is heavily implicated in climate change. It contributes to the three major greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide (CO2) from the use of fossil fuels, nitrogen oxide (N2O) from the use of chemical fertilizers and methane (CH4) from factory farming. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate change (IPCC), atmospheric concentration of CO2 has increased from a pre-industrial concentration of about 280 parts per million to 379 parts per million in 2005. The global atmospheric concentration of CH4 has increased from pre-industrial concentration of 715 parts per billion to 1774 parts per billion in 2005. The global atmospheric concentration of N2O, largely due to use of chemical fertilizers in agriculture, increased from about 270 parts per billion to 319 parts per billion in 2005.

Industrial agriculture is also more vulnerable to climate change which is intensifying droughts and floods. Monocultures lead to more frequent crop failure when rainfall does not come in time, or is too much or too little. Chemically fertilized soils have no capacity to withstand a drought. And cyclones and hurricanes make a food system dependent on long distance transport highly vulnerable to disruption.

Genetic engineering is embedded in an industrial model of agriculture based on fossil fuels. It is falsely being offered as a magic bullet for dealing with climate change.

Monsanto claims that Genetically Modified Organisms are a cure for both food insecurity and climate change and has been putting the following advertisement across the world in recent months.

9 billion people to feed.
A changing climate
Now what?
Producing more
Conserving more
Improving farmers lives
That's sustainable agriculture
And that's what Monsanto is all about.

All the claims this advertisement makes are false.
GM crops do not produce more. While Monsanto claims its GMO Bt cotton gives 1500 Kg/acre, the average is 300-400 Kg/acre.

The claim to increased yield is false because yield, like climate resilience is a multi-genetic trait. Introducing toxins into a plant through herbicide resistance or Bt. Toxin increases the "yield" of toxins, not of food or nutrition.

Even the nutrition argument is manipulated. Golden rice genetically engineered to increase Vitamin A produces 70 times less Vitamin A than available alternatives such as coriander leaves and curry leaves.

The false claim of higher food production has been dislodged by a recent study titled, Failure to Yield by Dr. Doug Gurian Sherman of the Union of Concerned Scientists, who was former biotech specialist for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and former adviser on GM to the U.S Food and Drug Administration. Sherman states, "Let us be clear. There are no commercialized GM crops that inherently increase yield. Similarly there are no GM crops on the market that were engineered to resist drought, reduce fertilizer pollution or save soil. Not one."

There are currently two predominant applications of genetic engineering: one is herbicide resistance, the other is crops with Bt. toxin. Herbicides kill plants. Therefore they reduce return of organic matter to the soil. Herbicide resistant crops, like Round Up Ready Soya and Corn reduce soil carbon, they do not conserve it. This is why Monsanto's attempt to use the climate negotiations to introduce Round Up and Round Up resistant crops as a climate solution is scientifically and ecologically wrong.

Monsanto's GMOs, which are either Round Up Ready crops or Bt toxin crops do not conserve resources. They demand more water, they destroy biodiversity and they increase toxics in farming. Pesticide use has increased 13 times as a result of the use Bt cotton seeds in the region of Vidharbha, India.

Monsanto's GMOs do not improve farmers' lives. They have pushed farmers to suicide. 200,000 Indian farmers have committed suicide in the last decade. 84% of the suicides in Vidharbha, the region with highest suicides are linked to debt created by Bt-cotton. GMOs are non-renewable, while the open pollinated varieties that farmers have bred are renewable and can be saved year to year. The price of cotton seed was Rs 7/kg. Bt cotton seed price jumped to Rs 1,700/kg.

This is neither ecological nor economic or social sustainability. It is eco-cide and genocide.

Genetic engineering does not "create" climate resilience. In a recent article titled, "GM: Food for Thought" (Deccan Chronicle, August 26, 2009), Dr. M.S. Swaminathan wrote "we can isolate a gene responsible for conferring drought tolerance, introduce that gene into a plant, and make it drought tolerant."

Drought tolerance is a polygenetic trait. It is therefore scientifically flawed to talk of "isolating a gene for drought tolerance." Genetic engineering tools are so far only able to transfer single gene traits. That is why in twenty years only two single gene traits for herbicide resistance and Bt. toxin have been commercialized through genetic engineering.

Navdanya's recent report titled, "Biopiracy of Climate Resilient Crops: Gene Giants are Stealing farmers' innovation of drought resistant, flood resistant and salt resistant varieties," shows that farmers have bred corps that are resistant to climate extremes. And it is these traits which are the result of millennia of farmers' breeding which are now being patented and pirated by the genetic engineering industry. Using farmers' varieties as "genetic material," the biotechnology industry is playing genetic roulette to gamble on which gene complexes are responsible for which trait. This is not done through genetic engineering; it is done through software programs like athlete. As the report states, "Athlete uses vast amounts of available genomic data (mostly public) to rapidly reach a reliable limited list of candidate key genes with high relevance to a target trait of choice. Allegorically, the Athlete platform could be viewed as a 'machine' that is able to choose 50-100 lottery tickets from amongst hundreds of thousands of tickets, with the high likelihood that the winning ticket will be included among them."

Breeding is being replaced by gambling, innovation is giving way to biopiracy, and science is being substituted by propaganda. This cannot be the basis of food security in times of climate vulnerability.

While genetic engineering is a false solution, over the past 20 years, we have built Navdanya, India's biodiversity and organic farming movement. We are increasingly realizing there is a convergence between objectives of conservation of biodiversity, reduction of climate change impact and alleviation of poverty. Biodiverse, local, organic systems produce more food and higher farm incomes, while they also reduce water use and risks of crop failure due to climate change.

Biodiversity offers resilience to recover from climate disasters. After the Orissa Super Cyclone of 1998, and the Tsunami of 2004, Navdanya distributed seeds of saline resistant rice varieties as "Seeds of Hope" to rejuvenate agriculture in lands reentered saline by the sea. We are now creating seed banks of drought resistant, flood resistant and saline resistant seed varieties to respond to climate extremities.

Navdanya's work over the past twenty years has shown that we can grow more food and provide higher incomes to farmers without destroying the environment and killing our peasants. Our study on "Biodiversity based organic farming: A new paradigm for Food Security and Food Safety" has established that small biodiverse organic farms produce more food and provide higher incomes to farmers.

Biodiverse organic and local food systems contribute both to mitigation of and adaptation to climate change. Small, biodiverse, organic farms especially in Third World countries are totally fossil fuel free. Energy for farming operations comes from animal energy. Soil fertility is built by feeding soil organisms by recycling organic matter. This reduces greenhouse gas emissions. Biodiverse systems are also more resilient to draughts and floods because they have higher water holding capacity and hence contribute to adaption to climate change. Navdanya's study on climate change and organic farming has indicated that organic farming increases carbon absorption by upto 55% and water holding capacity by 10% thus contributing to both mitigation and adaptation to climate change.

Biodiverse organic farms produce more food and higher incomes than industrial monocultures. Mitigating climate change, conserving biodiversity and increasing food security can thus go hand in hand.
Dr. Vandana Shiva is a philosopher, environmental activist and eco feminist. She has fought for changes in the practice and paradigms of agriculture and food, and assisted grassroots organizations of the Green movement in Africa, Asia, Latin America, Ireland, Switzerland, and Austria with campaigns against genetic engineering. In 1982, she founded the Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology, which led to the creation of Navdanya in 1991, a national movement to protect the diversity and integrity of living resources, especially native seed, the promotion of organic farming and fair trade. She is author of numerous books including, Soil Not Oil: Environmental Justice in an Age of Climate Crisis; Stolen Harvest: The hijacking of the Global food supply; Earth Democracy: Justice, Sustainability, and Peace; and Staying Alive: Women, Ecology, and Development. Shiva has also served as an adviser to governments in India and abroad as well as NGOs, including the International Forum on Globalization, the Women's Environment and Development Organization and the Third World Network. She has received numerous awards, including 1993 Right Livelihood Award (Alternative Nobel Prize) and the 2010 Sydney Peace Prize.

AnamPrema

Monsanto hat gesiegt

#5

Beitrag von AnamPrema » Di 26. Apr 2011, 19:13

unglaublich aber wahr
Anbau in Deutschland genehmigt

http://www.naturkost.de/wp/2011/04/genr ... genehmigt/

Benutzeravatar
Buchkammer
Förderer 2017
Förderer 2017
Beiträge: 3911
Registriert: Di 30. Nov 2010, 13:01
Wohnort: Thüringen
Kontaktdaten:

Re: Monsanto hat gesiegt

#6

Beitrag von Buchkammer » Do 28. Apr 2011, 12:45

Ja, dass hatte ich auch gerade im Ticker; unglaublich. Da fragt man sich, wofür sich die Ilse Aigner und ihr Landwirtschaftsministerium einsetzt. :hmm:
Gestern war ich klug und wollte die Welt verändern. Heute bin ich weise und möchte mich verändern. (Rūmī)
https://www.bewusste-menschen.de/

Benutzeravatar
Heiko
Beiträge: 580
Registriert: Fr 18. Mär 2011, 15:46

Re: Monsanto hat gesiegt

#7

Beitrag von Heiko » Do 28. Apr 2011, 22:28

Die Frage ist ob sie nicht schon viel eher gesiegt haben. Mittlerweile ist manch genveränderte Pflanze schon unkontrolliert unterwegs auf dem Erdball. Darf man den Aussagen Engdahls in seinem Buch glauben, scheint das wohl mehr oder weniger Absicht zu sein. Nicht umsonst wohl diese Kühlkammer für Saatgut auf Spitzbergen. Hat das Buch eigentlich jemand gelesen?

"Saat der Zerstörung"
Die vollends aufgeklärte Welt erstrahlt im Zeichen triumphierenden Unheils.

kraftort
Beiträge: 184
Registriert: Mi 4. Aug 2010, 20:01
Kontaktdaten:

Re: Monsanto hat gesiegt

#8

Beitrag von kraftort » So 1. Mai 2011, 08:26

...und es geht weiter:

"Ministerium vertraut Konzernen
Der weltgrößte Agrar- und Biotechnikkonzern Monsanto könnte sich schon bald selbst kontrollieren.
...Demnach soll es Konzernen wie Monsanto in Zukunft selbst überlassen werden, die Auswirkungen gentechnisch veränderter Saaten auf die Umwelt festzustellen und zu bewerten."


ganzer Artikel hier zu finden: http://www.orf.at/stories/2055492/2055474/

Sprachlose Grüße
kraftort

Benutzeravatar
Leipziger
Beiträge: 360
Registriert: Fr 27. Aug 2010, 15:37
Wohnort: Granada in Nicaragua
Kontaktdaten:

Re: Monsanto hat gesiegt

#9

Beitrag von Leipziger » Mo 2. Mai 2011, 01:37

:ohoh: Da kann man nur mit dem Kopf schütteln. :ohoh:

Da hilft nur .....................? :hmm:

Saludos Leipziger :ua:
[b][color=#400080]Lebe deinen Traum und verträume nicht dein Leben.[/color][/b]
https://www.facebook.com/fincaaleman

AnamPrema

Monsanto - weiter gehts

#10

Beitrag von AnamPrema » Mi 11. Mai 2011, 00:27

Hab heute mal Fernsehen geschaut und da war sie
die ultimative Unkrautvernichtungswerbung Roundup

http://www.roundup-garten.de/?gclid=CIv ... zAod9WBA6Q

Wir Deutschen/Europäer müssen verrückt sein - mehr fällt mir dazu gerade nicht ein.

Monsanto Düsseldorf

Alles auf englisch:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/ ... -a-history
http://www.environmentalhealthnews.org/ ... ngredients

Antworten

Zurück zu „Der Dorfschreier“